I spoke recently at Melcrum's 2006 Strategic Management Communication Summit in London. It was a thrill, of course, to be asked to fly across the pond and dispense a bit of wisdom (or practicality, as that's more my style) about corporate blogging.
In the UK, conference goers listen politely and take notes
I was fascinated by the difference between conference attendees in the UK and the US. In a word, conference goers in the UK are *polite.* Not a single laptop (with one exception) was open in the crowd of several hundred at the Millenium Gloucester (I loved this hotel) on Wednesday Oct. 18th. And this despite easy access to wireless Internet.
No one was tapping away on a keyboard (ostensibly taking notes but in reality checking email). In fact, no one even seemed to be looking at their Blackberry or Treo. Heavens!
Later, I met with Victoria Mellor, at left, and Robin Crumby, founders of Melcrum Publishing, in their London offices. Thanks guys for the great Japanese lunch around the corner.
Instead, the attendees, who were mainly senior-level corporate and internal communications managers at brands like HP, IKEA, Morgan Stanley, Microsoft, Cadbury Schweppes, PricewaterHouse Coopers, etc., were taking notes, listening carefully and otherwise paying attention!
OK, I admit I was itching to live blog the event
But I have to come clean. The whole thing felt very weird to me. I was itching to live blog some of the speakers. (Those tidbits later... if I can dig out my notes. Alas, my moment of inspiration may have passed.)
Nielsen BuzzMetrics bans conference blogging
Contrast this with the hue and cry over Nielsen BuzzMetrics' ban on live blogging during their recent clients-only CGM (consumer generated media) summit. A CGM extravaganza and no blogging allowed? Apparently it drove some attendees wild. Update: see clarification from Nielsen BuzzMetrics' Pete Blackshaw.
My take on it is that there should be some in-between space. Perhaps some sessions where no laptops are allowed and others where attendees are encouraged to record, comment and blog during the event. I know that as much as I'd like to think I can multi-task, I really can't listen, absorb, type, surf, edit and post simultaneously.
Forrester sets up an official conference blog
Another approach is to hire offer gratis admission to conference bloggers as Forrester Research did for their recent Consumer Forum. As I point out in chapter 4 of The Corporate Blogging Book, this is a highly effective way to promote your event. Your conference blog lives on and serves to promote your next event.
Useful Links
Should conferences ban blogging? - Steve Rubel on Micro Persuasion
Getting It Right: Forrester Consumer Forum and Conference Blogging - Marianne Richmond
Debbie,
Thanks for the mention.
I would like to note that Forrester did not hire bloggers as in "services for pay"...they waived the conference fee and we paid for our own travel and expenses.
Marianne
Posted by: Marianne Richmond | November 02, 2006 at 01:03 AM
Deb: Point of clarification; the decision to not have live blogging at our annual client meeting didn't drive our "attendees wild." Our clients overwhelmingly preferred that format, and we respected that, as any business should. Here's a relevant perspective from one of our largest clients (http://notetaker.typepad.com/cgm/2006/10/who_comes_first.html#comment-24874856)
I do agree it's an important debate, and I certainly hope future events elicit a higher comfort zone for "free and open" information sharing. But it's really our clients' decision.
The other important question here (perhaps fodder for your next book) is how we balance our work versus personal blogs. What set off this largely misunderstood issue was a summit participant (an agency partner) who took language from a client-specific memo related to the conference and posted it to his personal blog. I don't think there was any malicious intent on his part, but it does raise questions about "official" versus "non-official" blogging roles. Don't have the answer, but I do know it's an important, and timely, debate.
- PEte
Posted by: Pete Blackshaw | November 04, 2006 at 06:53 AM